The Great Replacement: Fact or Fiction

In this piece I want to closely examine something that the government, state and corporate media and of course the hard left, roundly dismiss - by reflex action - as an outlandish conspiracy theory.  A theory, indeed it is, but is there any evidence at all out there, that we can draw upon which points to the fact that there may very well be, a genuine conspiracy?  I will attempt to put this topic under the microscope to allow you, the reader, to reach your own conclusions as to whether it has any validity whatsoever.  All I will do is simply present to you, the information I have compiled, it is up to you to decide for yourself if the theory holds water or not.

The issue of replacement migration is a hot topic at present but to even pose such a question - in this new progressive Ireland - about the possibility of hidden or disguised motives which may, or may not be lurking just beneath the surface of what is always simplistically presented to us as benevolence, usually results in the predictable generic, idiotic cries of ‘racist’ or ‘bigot’ from the gallery of rabid ‘liberals’ (perhaps named for their liberal use of exaggerated accusations rather than any political leanings) who seem to be embedded within every state department, NGO and media outlet - never mind the Oireachtas.  It is tantamount to heresy, from the vantage point of the disciples of this new secular sect of ‘Woke’.  A notion which brings upon the guilty thought criminal, castigation, social exclusion (ironically), excommunication or the issuing of an atheistic ‘Fatwa’ from the present day preachers of the doctrine of Marx and Engels.  Thankfully the power of the written word, enables us to bypass the guttural demonic screams of the aforementioned ‘tolerant’ folk who actively seek to censor debate.  Sadly for them, all they can do here is simply rage at the page.

Before I proceed to the main body of the essay, I want to put out a little disclaimer.  I will be speaking plainly and brutally honestly in this essay, as that is the only way to address and approach a topic such as this.  If you are not a native of Ireland and you so happen to be reading this and become triggered or feel offended by any of my words, I do not care in the slightest, that is not my responsibility or my problem, your feelings are entirely your own business and solely your responsibility.  I will be speaking in broad, general terms in places, which may include critical (but not prejudicial) observations regarding certain ethnic groups, so if you identify with one of these groups, please have the good sense and maturity to realise and understand, that it is nothing personal.

I treat people as I find them and respect each person as an individual, regardless of race or religion.  It’s truly shocking that this needs to be said, but sadly these days context has a tendency to get lost sometimes when written down, due to the programming, propaganda and incessant race baiting from the despicable, now largely discredited mainstream media, who have sadly been quite successful at one thing.  That is the categorisation of people into distinct ethnic/spiritual/sexual groupings and the subsequent symbolic hammering of a wedge into the synthetic cracks they have created, defining these people, by highlighting and then weaponising their differences.  Separating them down ethnic and other lines of division, while simultaneously preaching ‘inclusivity’.  This has prompted me to stress this point, at the risk of labouring it, simply because I don’t want my words twisted by nefarious, dishonest individuals wishing to misrepresent me.  We now sadly live in an age where nuance and context take a back seat to emotional hissy-fits.

I also don’t want the many friends I’ve made from other cultures, who may have darker skin tones to me and who have come here through the correct channels, to live, work and assimilate, and have decided make their home here, to get the wrong idea.  No, I have not suddenly become the ‘hateful’ monster or villain, farcically portrayed by the media just because I oppose current government policy.  Don’t allow yourself to be patronised by falling into line with this lie, reserved solely for people who dare to think for themselves and then dare to speak those thoughts above their breath.  It is out of consideration and respect for these people that I say this.  Not out of compulsion, more out of courtesy.  It is most certainly not motivated by any fear of being called a racist or any other kind of name, by pathological liars, who may share the same skin colour and nationality as me, but whom I respect far, far less than any decent person from outside Ireland of any race, who has come here and respected our culture and values.  I value the opinion of these race baiting, virtue signalling fools even less than I respect them.  In fact, if we could deport some of these Irish traitors to Africa or beyond, it is an initiative I would give my full support to.  Alas, we are stuck with them sadly.

This piece is intended to be a cold, emotionless analysis of the situation facing us here in Ireland and in the wider continent of Europe as a whole.  We must never fear speaking honestly and openly on any topic.  Especially those that are highly charged and weaponised by vested interests with a totalitarian mindset, who wish to draw a forbidden red circle around certain subjects because it suits their narrative to declare them off limits.  Names and labels are a clear silencing tactic employed by those who want to just get on with things under the radar, a formula then parroted by their useful idiots, such as Antifa and their affiliates.  This is our country and we have every right to speak on such matters freely and without harassment, in order to explore the possibility of them having genuine merit.  Never allow these ideologues or career politicians to limit your speech or censor you.  Don’t allow them to firewall off your consciousness by attributing labels to you which are not true.  Know who you are.  Most of them have no clue who they are themselves, so are in no position to judge you.

Anyway, let’s proceed now and endeavour to address the real business at hand.  As we all know, historically and traditionally, the native people of Ireland have always been pale skinned.  It has been that way for millennia, we are the heirs to this land and to suggest otherwise is simply incorrect and disingenuous.  There are some historical revisionists (particularly on the left, as usual) who attempt to downplay this fact and in some instances try to undermine it completely.  Some even ridiculously suggest that this island was once populated by black pygmies.  That is not to say a person with different colour skin could not be considered Irish.  Two prime examples in my opinion would be Philip Lynott and Paul McGrath, both proud Dubliners who I would personally consider to be as Irish as me.  Another more recent example would be Kevin Sharkey, the wonderfully eloquent and softly spoken Kevin Sharkey, with his beautiful Donegal lilt, who has emerged recently as a real strong voice of reason in opposition to the traitors within the Irish establishment and their insistence on beating us over the head with their cudgel of multiculturalism as they continue gaslighting us with their lies and labels.  However, these are people who grew up here and were raised in the Irish way, they represented a sort of novelty status within the Irish psyche and although they perhaps would no doubt have some stories of soft racism growing up, those incidents I would wager would probably be few and far between.

You cannot eliminate individual, verbal acts of prejudice nor legislate for them, like McEntee and Co. are attempting to do, the pursuit of such lofty goals and ideals is in nearly every case a slippery slope towards authoritarianism.  People far more talented and politically capable than Helen McEntee have never tried to legislate for such things, because I’m sure they possessed the intelligence to be aware of this fact.  Hurt feelings can never be used as a basis for a criminal conviction and I applaud Seanad Éireann for performing its function as the final check and balance, by delaying the heinous and much maligned hate speech bill, before it was sent to the Áras to be signed into law. Doing what the lower house had failed to do, which was to have any meaningful debate on such a radical statutory reform.

The notion of the Irish - traditionally one of the biggest donators to charity per capita to the third world - being an inherently racist people is entirely a new phenomenon.  Not only is it greatly exaggerated, it would actually be closer to the realm of completely fabricated lies.  That is not to say it doesn’t exist at all in pockets, but it is most certainly not endemic or systemic as is being constantly claimed.  Sharkey in particular, I’m sure would not be courageously speaking out in defence of the Irish in the manner he currently is, if we really were the racist monsters the media insists on depicting us as.  He has been outspoken and opinionated his whole life and even flirted with the presidency.  Surely if we were such a racist country he would not have made it this far in life without having an extremely negative opinion of the place?  Suggesting that we are all racist should we disagree with their assertion that thousands of strange men being crammed into industrial units around the country is in fact a positive thing, is not only childish, but extremely divisive and in many ways evil.  To attack someone’s character in so flippant a manner is quite a nasty and wicked tactic, just because they disagree with you.  It’s certainly not conducive to the stated goals of ‘inclusion’.

Sharkey’s soft tones of dissent have acted like a paintbrush mixing the only black and white options available on the government sponsored easel, to sensibly and articulately introduce a few shades of grey to the picture.  I wonder how long before he’s subjected to a racial slur from the neo-liberal stool pigeon’s on this side of the Atlantic.  Remember the abuse Supreme Court Justice, Clarence Thomas was subjected to during the US election controversy.  George Takei who played Mr. Sulu in the original Star Trek series, even referring to him as a ‘Black face clown’.  These are the anti-racists remember.  Liberals have no time for exceptional black people who reject their charity and refuse to be patronised by them.  They are only useful when they have their hand out, because it keeps the NGO gravy train running.

Rather than people of different ethnicities complimenting and adding to our culture, as has happened in previous decades; what we currently have is huge swathes of people arriving here from Africa and the Middle East and elsewhere (often with no documentation or background checks), which is putting enormous strain on services and housing (despite what People Before Profit say), but also social cohesion.  This makes integration and assimilation extremely difficult and next to impossible, when people are basically just being planted here in such a short timeframe.  Instead of adding a thread to the tapestry of Irish life and society, it’s akin to the ‘Just Stop Oil’ protesters throwing a tin of paint or crude oil over a beautiful Van Gogh masterpiece.  What’s going on at this present moment is completely irresponsible.  It significantly increases the risk of ghettoisation and will no doubt contribute to an explosion in crime rates.  The counter argument to this is in almost every single instance - most sinisterly - is oversimplified as racism.

This brings us to another school of thought, which insinuates, that men, such as our friends - who I mentioned above - in IPAS centres - once here - deserve to have the red carpet rolled out for them and be handed everything freely at the expense of the Irish taxpayer.  To be ordained as residents and in fact now to even be considered Irish, by those who don’t believe in borders.  I don’t subscribe to the ‘magic dirt’ theory myself, these people are no more Irish than I would be Somalian, should I decide to up sticks and leave for Mogadishu in the morning to make my nest there.  It’s preposterous.  Dublin airport must be some sort of magical nationality altering portal, allowing people to take on all the traits and characteristics of the inhabitants of their new charitable home once a foot is placed on its tarmac.  This is of course poppy-cock and I am being slightly facetious but that’s all we are short of being fed at this point.  Not only is it false to refer to these people as the ‘new Irish’, it’s also extremely disrespectful to the men and women who died to free this country from the oppression of colonial imperialism.  It’s an insult to them and their memory, to suggest that what they struggled and fought long and hard for for centuries, is now only worth a piece of harp-headed paper and should not need to be worked for.  Our friends on the left falsely claim that they fought for an ‘Ireland for All’, this is completely false.  If you read the writings of Connolly, a man they constantly misrepresent, you will find he was actually largely opposed to migration, as it went against his principles as a hardcore trade unionist, as it created more competition, enabling employers to undercut workers by using the newcomers to drive down wages.  He wrote as much in his series of articles entitled ’Slackers’.  It’s not an Ireland for all, it’s an Ireland for the Irish and those we allow here.  That is of course if we had a sane government with a sensible position on immigration and we didn’t have an army of unemployable eternal students, spreading toxic ideologies and weaponising them through heavily funded NGO’s, financially backed by people like George Soros.

A famous quote from Michael Collins clearly showed the mentality and driving force behind the movement of Irish men and women, who sacrificed life and limb, in our struggle for freedom.  “We only succeeded after we had begun to get back our Irish ways, after we had made a serious effort to speak our own language, after we had striven again to govern ourselves.  We can only keep out the enemy and all other enemies by completing that task.  We are now free in name, the extent to which we become free in fact and secure our freedom will be the extent to which we become Gaels again.”  Do these sound like the words of a man who would be happy with the current situation?  Irish citizenship being handed out to all comers like snuff at a wake, by treacherous Irish politicians and bureaucrats at the behest of puppeteers on the continent, in Brussels and Davos, who have also pillaged our resources, ‘but sure didn’t they build us roads’.  I highly doubt he or Connolly would be impressed, or any of the other great men who stood alongside them.  They would be turning in their graves, if they could see what we’ve become.  They fought for the sovereignty of Irish people.  Now it appears - for the time being at least - that their sacrifice was in vain.

Even Irish citizenship in my view does not make you Irish.  You must fully immerse yourself in our culture and ways to get the privilege of calling yourself one of us.  It was a right extremely hard fought for, so by extension must be hard earned.  The people still here are the product and descendants of some of the toughest folk to ever walk this earth, surviving famine, war and abject poverty.  It is not the property of the criminals in Leinster House to give away, these quislings should face the ultimate punishment, should sanity ever return.  I believe one day it will, but not before this generation of Irish people take their turn at enduring suffering, just like their ancestors.  The men who made the ultimate sacrifice with their own blood, died fighting for the cause of a Gaelic Ireland, not the cosmopolitan basket case it has become.

Sadly, I think at this stage, the dreams and ideals of ethno-nationalists would be an extremely difficult and unrealistic aim to achieve and it is something that would most likely lead to genuine (not exaggerated) racial tensions.  Perhaps - God forbid - even a race war, if those in charge and their minions continue to pour petrol on the fire.  While I’m a strong advocate for limiting inward migration and also aiding the repatriation of the Irish diaspora where we can, making it easier for them to come home to keep our homeland as ethnically Gaelic as possible, I think we also need to accept the fact that the world has changed and people move around more.  If someone wants to come here and bring their skills to help enhance and contribute to our society, what rational person would oppose that?  So long as our culture is protected and remains the predominant one on this Island, people from elsewhere can be a positive addition.  The line must be drawn however, when uncontrolled numbers begin arriving here to contribute nothing.  Foreign vagrants and drug addicts from anywhere and everywhere, pitching tents on the streets and here to take what they can from our generous welfare system, while they also engage in violent crime and antisocial behaviour, as the Gardai look the other way.  Nobody with a criminal background with a history of violence who’s from another country, should be here.  It’s that simple.  If someone is convicted of a violent crime or theft, they should be deported.  They are not our responsibility, if they don’t play by our rules.  Rules and standards which are degrading by the hour sadly.

Why should we be expected to accept this?  Ireland is not a charity organisation and should not be used and exploited in this way.  The duty of our politicians is to us first as the sovereign Irish people.  Our employees have lost the run of themselves and need to be reminded pretty quickly that they work for us.  There are finite opportunities, services and resources here, which we are also being actively encouraged to reduce further, to improve the weather.  Major infrastructural investment is already badly needed in many areas as it is, so the mass influx of people will only have a negative impact and will upset overall social stability.  It will also be to the detriment to the homogeneity of our island and will have a disastrous impact on what makes us special and unique.  People come to visit Ireland largely for its people and our hospitality.  This famous virtue of ours has, I believe, been ruthlessly exploited by agenda setters to forward their plans, using pathological bleeding hearts as the tip of the spear to silence anyone making any sense.  All allegedly of course.  Importing vastly different cultures here all at once will not only change us forever, but also due to our relative population size, even when compared to London, will have a devastating, catastrophic effect.  We are not equipped for this and there is every chance we may not survive it.

The NGO sector who get billions from the government at the expense of us, the taxpayer, aggressively push divisiveness and not inclusiveness, on behalf of the state, with organisations like INAR actively coaching new arrivals to antagonise the natural Irish, by falsely placing the belief into their minds that we are xenophobic for not accepting enormous levels of unlimited migration into our country.  They are the foot soldiers who are responsible for the implementation of social scientific theories dreamt up by globalist think-tanks.  Heavily funded by foundations such as Open Society, to make their brainchild a reality.  Which leads us to the question at hand.  Is there actually a focused and deliberate strategy to displace the sons and daughters of Eriú?  Let’s examine this question, with some anecdotal and circumstantial evidence and ‘coincidences’ before we delve deeper into the data, statistical analysis.  We will also be taking a closer look at some of the global power brokers who may be steering such a plot, if it indeed exists.

Let’s begin with something as banal as advertising campaigns, which no longer just promote brands it seems.  The techniques of suggestion and placement of concepts into the human mind, is an extremely powerful and effective social programming tool.  An Post, Laya Healthcare, Bord Gais, to name but a handful - and in particular universities all across Ireland have all heavily featured native Africans in their advertising posters and marketing campaigns.  One would think our flag was reversed and we actually lived in the Ivory Coast, due to the sheer lack of ‘inclusion’ of the ‘Old Irish’.  Although RTÉ and the likes would have us all believe we are living in a similar climate to Africa of course, with doomsday laden, face melting forecasts despite the incessant rain in this horrendous summer.  This real world experience reminds us that yes, we do still in fact live in Ireland; but remember you mustn’t trust your own senses, you need expert advice to guide your thinking nowadays.  These companies and semi-state bodies (perhaps guided by ESG scores and diversity quotas) will of course no doubt, point to inclusivity and diversity being the driver of these target campaigns.  The reasoning will almost surely be ‘to be reflective of the new reality’ (perhaps deliberately contrived reality), making the newcomers feel welcome, giving them representation in their new country, but the over the top nature of it suggests something deeper could be at play.  It’s literally everywhere, so making a case for it being random and coincidental is quite difficult.  Where have the Irish all gone?  According to the most recent census in 2022, there are 67,546 people of African origin currently living in Ireland.  In a country with a population of just over 5 million people, this is a gross over-representation of a non-indigenous ethnic group.  Of course it’s not only people of African origin who are over-represented in these marketing campaigns, there are plenty of Asians and Middle Eastern people too, it is just the distinct absence of Paddy and Mary that is quite notable.

Cultural Appropriation is a term we now hear bandied about a lot, in these strange days.  Another made up woke concept, the exact definition of which, according to the Cambridge Dictionary, is:  ‘The act of taking or using things from a culture that is not your own, especially without showing that you understand or respect this culture’.  Every year on the 17th March our culture is ‘appropriated’ in parades all across the world, with people dressed up as Leprechauns, wearing silly green hats and red beards.  That’s perfectly fine however, because most Irish don’t easily offend and have a famed sense of humour, but going by these new absurd politically correct standards we are all supposed to just fall into line with, this would be a possible infraction.  An Arab man from the UAE living in Ireland called Abdullah Al Jumaili, who for diversity reasons was made a GAA ambassador.  He recently engaged in the usual race baiting we’ve come to expect from these types, while at the same time ‘appropriating’ our national sport of hurling.  “To all the racists and naysayers out there… Now that’s lovely hurling!”, he tweeted out, probably instructed by one of the many NGO’s in the country whose sole purpose for existing is to create racial tensions in a country that never had any.  This individual is clearly a stooge and provocateur, setting a trap for those who will bite and stupidly use racist comments, which will be then used as examples of hate.  This is how they operate, the age old Hegelian Dialectic.  Artificially constructed conflict and resolution or more commonly known as problem - reaction - solution.

Fintan O’Toole Irelands very own, self styled, Pravda-esque scribe, recently wrote an article under the heading, ‘Ireland can be proud of itself only if it can confront its shameful deeds’.  A typically condescending title from arguably the most pompous man in the country.  He would want to look a little closer to home before passing judgement.  He could start with actually making an attempt at some journalism instead of unquestioningly regurgitating the official line verbatim.  When will you atone for your shameful deeds O’Toole?  The title alone was enough for me not to bother to read it but the picture that went with it was hilarious, if it wasn’t so insulting and sinister.  In a deliberate attempt to rewrite Irish history, there was a still from what looked like a stage play of the 1916 Rising.  I’m only guessing, but I say this because the man in the centre of the three looks like he’s supposed to be Padraig Pearse.  The individual to the left of him is a black man holding a flagpole with a tricolour.  A controversy I’d be almost sure, the legend that is Fintan, lovingly courted.  The good little boy that he is, practicing some ‘Machiavellianism’ on behalf of his paymasters.  It’s just total nonsense and gaslighting, designed to provoke a reaction, from a justifiably angry public, who can then be portrayed as racist or far right.  It is the kind of cultural appropriation that we Irish should find offensive, but are expected to just suck it up.  Why are our heroes to be insulted in such a manner?  The ‘New Irish’ seem to not only be taking over Irelands present and it’s future (going by potential forecasts and projections), but now also it’s past.  You will of course be deemed racist for highlighting or even noticing this.  That I would surmise is the whole point.  To anyone with a functioning critical brain it’s an obvious trap to anger certain people who disapprove.

A century is not that long of a time span, particularly for a country as steeped in history as Ireland.  Though this type of disrespectful narrative forming and consensus construction, almost certainly goes unnoticed by the younger generation.  It feels like a contrived attempt to scrub history, rewriting the past to shape the present.  The old ‘Year zero’ concept.  This is a complete falsehood, it’s a sinister lie which subtly and underhandedly rewrites the past.  It plants the seed that this new world artificially created by globalisation, was always how things were.  It wasn’t.  Our history and traditions matter.  Children nowadays have been taught, correctly in my opinion to treat people how you would wish to be treated yourself, but not at the expense of having a warped, inaccurate understanding of their own history and the people who they came from.  This dynamic looks to have been turned on its head and weaponised.  Twisted to rob us of our identity and making our heritage not seem all that important.  Using people’s good nature against them and if they dare have a contrary opinion, label them as racist.  This is not about race, it’s about historical accuracy and we see this type of thing all of the time now in popular culture, with Netflix, Amazon Prime and Disney, vandalising much loved, timeless classics in order to surgically transplant Marxist ideals such as equity, diversity and inclusion.  Rather than making them cool and modern and tolerant (which is the cover story) it only serves to make them vulgar, uninteresting and gaudy.  It’s merely for its own sake and adds no creative or artistic value.  Star Wars and Lord of the Rings have turned into dull tacky franchises.  Why is it fine to appropriate our culture?  Bridgerton, an English period drama is a particularly asinine example, which I initially thought was a parody.  Why do the rules only apply in one direction?  Imagine the uproar if a white man was cast as Shaka Zulu!  There is absolutely no difference.

As someone who holds the men of 1916, in the highest possible regard, I find this depiction deeply offensive and I do not offend easily.  Not because of the man’s skin colour, but because it’s just plain ridiculous and wrong.  It is not the actor’s fault, he is simply taking a paying job, but in my view he has been selected for that role deliberately to both tick a ‘diversity’ box and also to cause controversy.  To antagonise the Irish who see that period and monumental struggle as solely theirs and no one else’s.  It is also absolutely no accident in my view that O’Toole chose that picture for his article.  The chief propagandist constantly telling us how terrible and how racist we all are, would have relished that and revelled in it.  The tiresome pontificating from this pseudo-intellectual is wearing thinner with each passing day.  It is race baiting in the extreme, but it seems the feelings of the Irish come secondary to basically everyone else’s.

On Sunday 13th of August I went into Smithfield for the Luke Kelly Festival.  I expected a ‘wokefest’, so I kind of knew beforehand, what I was getting myself into, but I decided to grin and bear it for the sake of the music.  My wife asked me to go in and it was something to do with the family.  Even my own cynical expectations were surpassed by what I witnessed.  In the entire 4 hours I spent there I heard one Luke Kelly song.  A guy on a banjo belting out a lazy, beyond average rendition of ‘Hand me down my Bible’ on the main stage.  That RTÉ type Irish mainstream mediocrity, that’s perennially rammed down our throats.  This was sandwiched in between a female vocal world music style group (who were excellent by the way), they were like a female version of Ladysmith Black Mambazo.  I actually thought at one stage I was at a tribute for Paul Simons Graceland album.  I absolutely love that type of music and as a musician myself- like most - black music in general has been a huge part of my life and so many of my musical influences are black.  That’s not the point however, as I went in to see the music of Luke Kelly, an Irishman, but instead Dublin City Council decided to try program me with a large dose of cultural enrichment, when they falsely advertised something else entirely on posters and billboards all across Dublin.  The psychological reframing just below the surface of the pseudo-reality construct is becoming more and more obvious to anyone with eyes to see.

To add insult to injury, there was a marquee set up where children could make their own Luke Kelly wig.  But of course they had to be reminded of our collective responsibility for the planet, with framed pictures with the logo for the sustainable development goals 12 and 13; Responsible Production and Consumption and Climate Action.  They can’t just let the children have fun.  They need to encroach on every aspect of their lives, with their propaganda.  There were a few eco-communists in hi-viz vests handing out the wool, with the message reaffirmed on the vests.  Likely the work of The Behavioural Research Unit of the ESRI or some other societal change institute, who are now advising and working hand in glove with Dublin City Council and other government departments, to subliminally plant a few synthetic seeds, nudging us towards the behavioural patterns desired by the system.  Not at all Orwellian.  The whole thing was just so forced, inauthentic garbage and I ran out of the place just before Damian Dempsey arrived on the main stage at 5pm.  The thoughts of witnessing ’Raglan Road’ getting murdered, suffering an untimely death by Paddywhackery, was just a little too much to stomach for one day.

The socio-cultural observations just covered would obviously be dismissed by people like Fintan O’Toole, out of hand, as nonsense, totally innocent, coincidental and mere conjecture, but does this subtle psychological displacement transfer in any way into the real world?  Let us now take a closer look if there is any evidence that this ‘replacement theory’, has any bearing in physical reality.  Are people from elsewhere being prioritised ahead of the native Irish in our own country?  Recently a whole housing development of 64 modular homes was completed in Mahon on the outskirts of Cork City.  There are 700 such homes set to be built around the country, reportedly all for Ukrainians.  The argument given to justify the building of these homes is also always presented as an emotive, simplistic, compassionate one.  “They are fleeing war” come the unified cries of everyone from radio talk show hosts all the way up to and including the Taoiseach.  We can argue about the morality all day long of what the government and opposition unanimously refer to as our “moral and international obligations” to provide refuge for people in need from a country on the frontier of Eurasia.  But the fact this suicidal compassion has now extended out to the wider world, betrays a sense of intelligent design and planning.  It has a look of the wheels already being in motion, with the machine just waiting to click into gear to exploit a crisis to its fullest.  It didn’t take too long for Ukrainian women and children to transform into young men from everywhere but Ukraine.  All this moral grandstanding simply clouds the more obvious issue.

Before Covid took centre stage and dominated the headlines in 2020, homelessness was the topic front and centre and on everybody’s lips.  People have very short memories at times and have a tendency to put an issue into the back of their minds once a new one comes along to occupy the conversation in the staff canteen.  The obvious question to ask is, where was the energy, enthusiasm or political will to build these type of dwellings for the Irish homeless back then, if they can be done with such speed and ease for Ukrainians?  There was no compassion for Irish children sleeping rough on the cold streets of our cities.  Fine Gael were also in government then and we were constantly told at the time that building social housing on this scale was a huge undertaking that would take years.  The people were basically fobbed off and their concerns ignored.  The Minister for Housing at the time, Eoghan Murphy callously declared, “there will always be homeless people”.  A typically dismissive, elitist response, one we have become accustomed to, from the aloof Blueshirts, who we are now expected to believe are akin to a caring fairy godmother.  Having recently witnessed the ease at which planning laws can be bent, fire safety certifications and other regulatory documents can be obtained - when the will is there from state departments - and also the speed with which these new modular builds shot up, one can only logically assume that the Irish don’t matter as much to the establishment, as our new visitors.

Things which have usually taken years, have now been shown to be possible in a remarkably short time frame if enough effort is applied, so past excuses and failings, not only look like political abstraction, but now just appear to be plain old lies from an indifferent parasitic class.  In the shadow of all this superficial altruism, we still have an incomplete children’s hospital remember.  One which has already run massively over budget.  Surely an establishment who claimed to be so concerned about health over the past few years, would prioritise finishing such a project, focusing every available resource on its completion.  They did after all shut the country down for a virus which was 99.8% non-fatal.  Some pointed out (too much derision) the excessive nature of such measures, but lives needed to be saved of course.  Helping these people who are claiming asylum, is the new fashionable cause.  A cause far more likely to get the politicians the attention and adulation from the outside world they so crave.  Is it just their demonstrable, longstanding need for international attention and validation fuelling all this, or is there perhaps something even more sinister at play?  They will of course most likely have their answers ready and use the old chestnut of ‘fleeing war’, but if we ignore the political spin and look logically at it, it becomes clear that things just don’t add up.  Since 2019 - when this was the top story on the  nationwide news and was deemed a major crisis, even a national emergency - homelessness among the Irish population has increased significantly.  In 2021, the figure was at 8,313.  The latest figure from May has seen it rise to 12,441 people.

This is a truly shocking statistic, especially when you take our current migration policy into consideration.  Is suffering a measurement to be gauged by a system of moral hierarchy?  Why should the sight of Irish children languishing on the streets in the cold winter, eating from aluminium trays be treated with any less immediacy than giving aid to people from places many Irish couldn’t point to on a map?  Surely by any reasonable standards, the sensible thing to do would be to tidy your own house first before you start cleaning someone else’s?  Or is there a commercial value attached to each human head being brought in?  Are these people being simply used as commodities, with lucrative contracts offered by foreign interests in order to ensure wealthy supporters on the ground are incentivised and properly remunerated, for unwittingly serving a possible wider agenda which is the primary topic of this article?  How else can such a betrayal of the Irish be explained away?  It’s also a really good time to be in the human trafficking business, with such relaxed border security.  Prostitution and child trafficking is highly likely to be on the increase in this type of environment.  The recent figures from the CSO indicate that the majority of migrants now coming into the country are young males from Africa.  What happened to the women and children from Ukraine?  The international protection issue seems to not only have piggybacked on the Ukraine one, but look to have actually usurped it completely.

The month of June saw the majority of new arrivals into the country come from Algeria according to the government’s own statistics, there are also a few from Albania and Georgia, both countries - like Algeria - who are not currently at war.  So why the need for international assistance or protection?  It is remarkably coincidental and convenient how the two issues have seamlessly dovetailed to provide cover for our previously discussed ’international obligations’.  In the early stages the influx of migrants managed to surf the wave of goodwill and enjoyed almost universal public support due to compassion for victims of the Ukrainian crisis, but that has largely evaporated due to the sight of well dressed, fit young men clearly not from Ukraine being delivered en masse to direct provision centres by the likes of Corduff Travel without any consultation with the local communities.  Ongoing protests around Dublin, which ignited in East Wall last November and have spread throughout the city and country like wildfire, most recently in Ballybrack.  This suggests a major shift in public opinion, showing that the initial goodwill has largely dissipated and people now want answers.

Recently a Facebook post was put up by what looks to be (surely not) yet another NGO, called Tuath Housing Association, which drew huge ire from the public when it showed families not originally from here being housed in fancy new homes.  Considering the most recent estimate carried out in 2021, showed the average time on the waiting list for social housing was 9.67 years, it is highly unlikely that every one of these families simply joined the back of the queue and waited their turn.  They are being helped and coached by somebody, you don’t just arrive in a new country and get a full understanding of the inner workings of the system.  Who is helping them?  Why is this same help not being offered to the homeless Irish?  These are all reasonable questions which are invariably met with a torrent of abuse if posed to anyone from within the system or on the political left and also sadly met with general apathy from most people outside of it, not aligned with either side.  Recent figures show that 68% of Irish adults between the age of 25 and 29, are still living at home with their parents.  Something is drastically wrong here.  The system is clearly not functioning for native Irish young people, who just like previous generations are finding they need to emigrate to make any sort of a life for themselves.  Things are not tallying and it’s time we got answers.  But as we know critical thinking is racist.

Islam is gaining more and more of a foothold too in Ireland, with the GAA seemingly now quite happy to make the holding of the festival of Eid Al-Adha at Croke Park an annual occurrence.  It’s a little bit bizarre that they would allow this to happen in a place where Irish blood was spilt on Bloody Sunday during our struggle for freedom from the British during the War of Independence.  I can’t be the only person in the country who this doesn’t sit right with.  Ireland has no history with this religion historically yet they are now here in huge numbers and have been handed the keys to our national stadium.  Why?  I have met some really lovely Muslim people in my time and I genuinely mean that.  Some incredibly kind and decent people practice this religion, however it’s undeniable that due to the vast diversity in interpretation of the Qu’ran and the fact that there is no real central teaching, there is huge potential for fundamentalism.  You need look no further than the beheadings of two Sligo men last year and the attempted murder of another by Yousef Palani, who pleaded guilty only recently to the gruesome killings.  He left the country briefly for Iran and was said to be radicalised before returning.  The Independent newspaper later ran a story claiming that his family were subjected to racial abuse following the killings.  A source was quoted in The Sun newspaper as having said, “There was no suggestion of any kind of stalking being involved and the reality is only he knows the real reasons why he killed two innocent people.”  Why the constant attempts to downplay what was clearly an execution of a similar style seen in years gone by, carried out by terrorist grouped such as ISIS?  The inference being that such gruesome acts are not something that we have actually imported here from somewhere else.  I struggle to recall such a barbaric slaughter ever carried out in Ireland from an Irishman.  We have had our fair share of vicious murders, but the manner of this one was particularly disturbing.  The sexual orientation of the victims and the openly strict disapproval of their bedroom practices, by practitioners of this religion, suggests that these sadly may not be the last killings of this type we see here in Ireland, judging by the sheer volume of Muslims now here.

Jihad is encouraged by some proponents of this faith and once a sizeable number of Muslims get organised they will want their own representation, outside of the culture of whatever country they are in.  A parallel society, never fully assimilating with our own.  This is not conjecture, this has been proven time and again in places like Pakistan and Lebanon, it happened over centuries in these countries.  Pakistan in particular had religions ranging from Hinduism to Buddhism to Zaroastrianism, but over time Islam became the most dominant.  With the spiritual vacuum that now exists in the west, particularly with the decline of Christianity, Islam is more than well placed to become the dominant religious force to take over and in a much shorter time frame than before.  The United Kingdom is now beginning to witness this unfold in real time.  Recent protests at the Swedish Embassy and demonstrations on O’Connell Street over the burning of a certain book in the Scandinavian country have absolutely nothing to do with Ireland, yet the large numbers gathered on our streets for an issue that has nothing to do with us, gives a clear indication of what might come in the future, should we Irish upset or offend these people.  It is a religion of conquest which pursues a Caliphate.  The desire to push for Sharia law is always present.  It’s being openly spoken about now in the UK and I believe even practiced in some places.  The most common name in Galway last year for boys was not anything that would be considered conventionally Irish.  In 2023, Muhammad surpassed Jack which was the most popular boys name the previous year.  Indicating the huge influx into just one of Ireland’s cities from people from the faith of Islam.  The last census showed that there were now 81,930 Muslims living here in Ireland.  On average Muslim women have 2.9 children compared to the Christian average of 2.6.  In 2023 the number of children born to Irish women is 1.768.  That’s a swing of almost one child per woman.  This is a worrying trend if we are to maintain an ethnically Gaelic majority on this island.

The provisions allowed for under the Immigration Council of Ireland’s Family Reunification Program, will further accelerate wholesale changes to the demographic of this country.  Any refugee within the first 12 months of arriving here is eligible to avail of this program.  Decisions are made based upon their own status here, but given how loosely and lenient our border controls have been, I would hazard a guess that meeting the required criteria would likely not be too demanding, particularly when you consider Helen McEntee granted asylum to 17,000 people who were living here illegally.  Refugees and migrants who make an application may be reunited with parents, children and even siblings, who can in turn apply themselves once they arrive here.  It paints a pretty stark picture for the future when all these metrics are taken into consideration.  Back in 2005, the president of DCU, Prof Ferdinand von Prondzynski (good Irish name) stated that by 2050 Irish people will likely be a minority on this island, but suggested that large scale migration was still necessary for prosperity and economic growth to continue.  Easy for someone with no stake in the preservation of our culture, heritage and traditions to say.  I would suggest, Ireland and it’s people are worth far more than the opinion of this professor, but of course we are now constantly told that our opinions are irrelevant when balanced against that of an academic with letters after their name.

Turning now to the field of education, the controversial new school curriculum will expose Irish children to radical new reforms which are deemed ‘age appropriate’ by our friends in TENI and BelongTo who have more or less written the curriculum.  It will introduce new concepts regarding sex, relationships and identity which will likely result in children becoming confused by gender ideology and will even begin to question their very identity and who they are (many believe that is the purpose).  Warping their minds at a very young age, when their little brains are not equipped to understand such complexities.  It is the state flexing its muscles and acting as surrogate by insisting they know best when it comes to the subject matter children must now consume in their lessons.  I somehow doubt Muslims will be on board with their children learning about multiple genders and some of the other radical concepts the Department of Education have made compulsory for the new SPHE curriculum.  Critical Race Theory is also coming to schools, where Irish children will be encouraged to feel guilty for the sins of previous generations of slave masters who were not even part of their social class, simply because of their skin colour, a racist concept if there was ever one.  The notion of ‘white privilege’ is a double edged sword that will both weaken white children and embolden black children to feel a sense of entitlement.  They will be taught to demand reparations and seek restitution from children who did them absolutely no personal harm.  They will feel as though they deserve to be compensated for something that was never taken from them in the first place and this will only serve to foster an ‘us and them’ mentality, the opposite of what is claimed to be inclusion.    Events stateside don’t paint a pretty picture of the potential impacts of this mindset.

White children will be bullied by black children and it will be ignored, tolerated and even justified, because firstly the promoted concept ‘white privilege’ will be at its root, but also because no one will be allowed to speak up in condemnation of a member of a newly created protected class (what the hate speech bill allows for) should they perpetrate an assault.  Not because black children are bad, it would be the exact same in the reverse as it is human nature that certain types of people regardless of race, will ruthlessly exploit any little advantage handed down to them from on high.  If you don’t highlight a difference in ethnicity to children, just watch how naturally and happily they play together and attune organically to one another.  It’s the failings and cynicism of adults which tends to over time alter this dynamic.  Now you will have an authority figure coming along highlighting their differences and telling a child from one group, they are in essence purer and better than a child from another group, because of what someone with the same colour skin as that child did to black people in other countries centuries ago during slavery.

In more recent times, America did have the uncivilised practice of segregation, which was rightfully outlawed in 1964.  The civil rights movement in America at that time, saw some truly amazing and iconic African Americans come to the forefront.  Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, both assassinated due to the danger they presented for the US administration, but also men like Muhammad Ali, a sporting legend who’s greatness extended beyond his incredible boxing abilities into other areas.  South Africa had an even more recent dark period, with the end of Apartheid coming in 1994.  When Nelson Mandela negotiated the terms of a new constitution with FW de Klerk, it paved the way for majority rule in the country.  It now sadly seems the peace brought to the country by former President has now been largely forgotten by his people now that they have the majority.  The barbarism carried out by the former white South Africans on blacks is now sadly happening in the reverse.  “Kill the Boer”the chants ring out as white men are murdered after watching their women being gang raped.  It shows people rarely learn from the past.  Former scars which haven’t healed, can re-emerge and manifest in the most horrific ways, especially when racial tensions are amplified.  The exaggerated rhetoric we are seeing now, with the new incorrectly applied definitions for what constitutes racism, we are creating a recipe for disaster if we don’t start having sensible adult conversations about all of this.

The introduction of CRT will be a hot-bed for resentment and animosity and could have the potential to breed genuine hatred.  It will create a pack mentality, there is absolutely nothing surer and it will be to the detriment and disadvantage of Irish kids.  The injustices previously mentioned have absolutely nothing to do with innocent Irish children, yet they will be made feel as though they are responsible.  Worse again black children will believe them to be.  It’s wrong and actually quite sick.  We can already see the negative impacts CRT has had in the United States.  There was a sickening clip in America which went viral, of a black female teacher smacking around a masked up white child.  An absolutely disgusting, evil, cowardly act, carried out by someone abusing her power, confident of her righteousness.  Her protected characteristics that will soon enjoyed by certain groups this side of the pond, confirmed as much to her.  This lunacy will see the bad people within those groups (and they most certainly exist) exploit their new found elevated status for personal gain in the new social hierarchy.  This will not be tolerated here, hate crime laws or not.  This is entirely an American cultural phenomenon being imported here, to be imposed upon the Irish children who have nothing to apologise to the African continent for.  It has no business even being spoken about over here, never mind being taught to our children.  We were never a colonial power and have sent millions to Africa over the years in charitable donations.

Many Irish people still go over to the continent to help build houses, schools, orphanages and hospitals every year.  The Irish have always been friends to the African people.  Handing over our country and having to constantly apologise for the transgressions of past British, French, Belgian, German and Dutch elites however, is a step too far.  Ordinary people, who just want to get on with their lives are becoming more and more irritated by this.  We owe no one an apology for simply having a particular colour skin, which is the central teaching of CRT.  Skin colour has absolutely no correlation with privilege or opportunity, certainly not in the present day, where most people have equal opportunities.  This kind of skewed thinking and teaching will set us back decades.  We Irish are no strangers to oppression ourselves.  Less than 200 years ago there was a famine (really a genocide when you delve deeper) in this country.  This fact is constantly used by the left as some sort of twisted justification for all the nonsense that’s been brought in.  Yet I don’t recall many tales of the Irish having the red carpet rolled out for them everywhere they went.  The left continually twist the phrase ‘No Blacks, No dogs, No Irish’, a famous slogan said to have been displayed across shop windows as a welcome to the Irish as the endeavoured to forge a life for themselves in the New World.  The also parrot the phrase - like a chorus of mindless automatons - “sure didn’t the Irish go everywhere ourselves”.  As if that sentence provides justification for the relinquishing of the Irish homeland to anyone who decides to call themselves Irish on any given day.  The oversimplification of an argument (when it suits them) is the forté of the left.

The fact that people who left this country almost two centuries ago, were greeted with the slogan I just referenced, when they sought employment (yes employment, not handouts) in cities like Boston and New York, we are told provides justification for the recently economically successful Irish to unconditionally hand over a sizeable portion of that newly acquired wealth through taxation, to young men from Africa, Albania, Georgia and the Middle East.  Closer to home, the Irish who decided to stay here in the face of abject poverty, lived in places like the tenement slums of central Dublin, which had some of the worst, most squalid conditions of any capital city in any country in the western world.  It was only until relatively recently that people were moved into new housing projects in the likes of Ballyfermot, Ballymun and others throughout the 1940’s and 50’s.  If any people, of all the traditionally white nations can relate to the suffering of black people, it’s the Irish.  What’s being pushed now, in no way attempts to repair the past and learn from it.  It instead has the capacity and capability to create an environment where future atrocities can be easily made possible and dare I say even justified.  An orchestrated attempt to highlight divisions between races (which is always good for the power structure) deceptively disguised as virtue.

The likes of Dr. Ebun Joseph, a Nigerian woman who has lived here and lectured (in more ways than one) in institutions such as UCD and Trinity, is one of the main proponents of this new thinking here in Ireland.  Constantly given a platform to spout complete and utter nonsense and is treated with kid gloves by every presenter whose show she finds herself on, to be pandered to and promoted.  She is the coordinator of the first Black Studies module in Ireland at UCD.  Why?  This is Ireland.  Our culture doesn’t receive nearly as much backing, or indeed respect and as we have already seen.  When it does it is misrepresented and appropriated (to use their terminology).  The prominence of this individual - who I have never actually once heard make any sense - and the ideas she espouses and is being given carte blanche to promote (and clearly funding) seems anything but organic or a consequence of the natural order of things.  She is most definitely getting a push from somewhere.  Anti-racism is her grift.  You don’t just need to be ‘not a racist’ in her book, no you need to be actively ‘anti-racist’.  This may of course entail some serious introspection, self deprecation and also the denigration of your own race, culture and traditions.  But you must play your part to prove you harbour no bigotry.  The possible deletion of past figures who were guilty of ‘wrong think’ by todays lofty, progressive ideals and expectations is also on the menu, with the delectable ‘bill of fare’, including the removal of statues from public spaces and the rewriting of history to reflect current sensibilities.  The deleterious effects on the psyche of the progeny of the age old inhabitants of her newly adopted home - which has provided her with a life of relative comfort in comparison to Benin City, from where she hails - are of course secondary and irrelevant.  They are simply racist should they disagree.  It represents a type of psychic invasion far more subtle than conquering armies, but designed to have no less a subduing effect on its target.  ‘White guilt’ is the new reverse racism and not only is it tolerated, it’s promoted.  Let’s be honest and call it what it is - reverse racism.

Racially motivated attacks are already not uncommon coming from black people against whites.  When George Nkencho could not be restrained by members of An Garda Siochána after a violent spree in Clonee, Co. Meath in 2020 and was subsequently shot and killed by an officer who felt his life was threatened, there was retaliation from the African community in the Blanchardstown area.  Attempts from People Before Profit politicians, particularly Bríd Smith to liken it to Ireland’s George Floyd moment, only poured petrol of an already red hot inferno.  Video footage of a woman and her child being set upon and attacked by a group of black youths, was strangely absent from mainstream publications.  Had the reverse occurred, I’m sure it would still be used as a psychic weapon to beat the indigenous racists over the head with to this day.  Racist attacks are not unilateral nor are endemic.  There are good and bad people in all races, but it’s often the worst representations, who sadly, often become the standard bearers.  The selective victim championing that occurs in the modern landscape, however, would lead you to believe, the monstrous white man is responsible for all the worlds ills.  I will concur with the assertion that young black men in America have often been the subject of police brutality, but that certainly doesn’t go on here in Ireland.  Once again showing the desire to import social mores from the US to be superimposed onto the Irish green-screen by Irish left wing politicians who watched one too many episodes of Blue Bloods.  The stereotypes which arise on both sides of racial divide, are invariably cultivated and weaponised by those who profit from division, while at the same time  they hypocritically preach about diversity.

Nursing homes are places supposed to provide comfort, support and protection for our sick and vulnerable elderly, whose family’s can no longer provide them with the adequate level of care they require.  They have been in the news of late for negative reasons, regarding Fair Deal and other reasons.  But chief among them was the story of a Nigerian man, by the name of Emmanuel Adeniji, who was recently convicted of raping an elderly woman (given the pseudonym ‘Emily’) who was suffering from dementia, has brought into sharp focus the need for proper screening and Garda vetting for people working with the vulnerable.  The HSE’s National Independent Review Panel (NIRP) deduced that on the balance of probability, chances were extremely high - given that most patients in the Kildare care home had dementia - that there were more victims.  Some of these patients would likely have availed of the Fair Deal Scheme.  Selling the home they worked all their lives for, to the state in return for not only substandard care, by non-Irish people who they can’t relate to (who may also not have the same level of patience as an Irish person would for their own elderly), but the added risk of being put at the mercy of a potential predator.  It’s outrageous.

Adeniji was given an 11 year sentence, but will most likely return to our streets sooner to reoffend, instead of being deported back to his native homeland of Nigeria.  How did this predator end up working for the HSE in close proximity of those who needed the most care?  How is this even possible?  The recent Tusla scandal was another case, where vulnerable children this time were exposed to foreign grooming gangs.  So at either end of the spectrum, in the state agencies entrusted with protecting the young and the elderly, there was an enormous level of negligence.  At best there was a dereliction of duty regarding screening, at worst there may actually have been collusion with the predators, due to there being separate but similar incidents, in the very two agencies that should be absolutely water tight in terms of the controls they have in place.  The fact that violent, sexual deviants from abroad slipped through the net in two separate state departments speaks volumes.

While Ireland is experiencing record levels of inward migration there also seems to be a concerted effort by the Irish Times in particular to encourage our own people to leave.  Rarely does a week pass, where we don’t see a puff piece about some Irish family living abroad who ‘made the tough decision’ that turned out to be worth it.  Moving to America, Canada or Australia for a better quality of life.  The government actively recruit nurses from the Philippines and elsewhere while Irish nurses hold up banners in cities like Sydney, Dubai, Doha and even London, with ‘Give us a reason to come home’ emblazoned across them.  I have a sister living in Arizona myself, who came home for a year in 2020, just before the whole Covid nightmare started.  The level of bureaucratic red tape and hassle both she and her husband went through was enough to convince them that they were never coming back to live in Ireland.  They were quoted enormous car insurance premiums due to the fact they had not been residents here for a number of years and didn’t have any No Claims Bonus.  The difficulty they had getting their furniture here on containers and numerous other headaches they had to endure, confirmed for them that they had made the correct decision in emigrating.  Now I have two nephews living 5000 miles away, who I will only ever have a relationship with through FaceTime, with the exception of fleeting visits from both my family and hers to either side of the Atlantic.  Mine is certainly not a unique situation and is quite possibly a reality for even a majority of Irish extended families.  The old adage of Ireland being a fertile mother but a barren nurse, is now only partly true.  There seems to be an endless supply of milk for other people’s kids while her own are cast out onto the streets to fend for themselves.

These are only the immediate tangible variables that are contributing to the steep opposing trends on the migration graphs.  There are also subtle intangibles which are far less noticeable and take longer to have an impact on the overall picture, but are no less significant when spanning over the course of a decade, for instance.  Since abortion was made legal in Ireland after the 2018 referendum, there have been just shy of 20,000 terminations.  I’ve said in previous articles, that this has almost become somewhat of a sacrament for the left in this country.  Euthanasia is next on the agenda, with a similar enthusiasm for this life ending action already evident within left wing circles.  Last month, speaking at the Joint Committee Debate on Assisted Dying, Senator Lynn Ruane, could barely contain her glee as she chuckled at the prospect of people with severe mental health issues being given the all clear to meet their maker with the help of the state.

Mental health as most of us are well aware, has been a hot topic for a number of years now.  There have been incessant campaigns through the mass media to de-stigmatise the issue, without ever any real effort, political will or investment to solve what seems to be a growing problem in the modern, materialistic, soulless world.  Suicides have been a huge problem particularly in young men, with a 6:1 ratio when compared with women.  However, I’m sadly hearing of more and more women of late killing themselves now too.  Anecdotally at least it would appear to be becoming more common.  Celebrities go on talk radio talking about their feelings and how it’s ok and normal to feel depressed while at the same time places like Dundrum Mental Hospital are being repurposed to build over 800 new affordable social housing units.  You could take an educated guess as to who might be prioritised for those new homes.  Dare I say, they seem to be attempting to make it trendy.  Perhaps I’m being overly cynical, but it just wreaks of insincerity and social engineering.  Sadness is a part of life, the idea of people having to be happy all the time is unrealistic and just not how things are.

While it’s good to talk about your problems and feelings (which men have historically been bad at) why not encourage methods which promote stoicism, strength and endurance, instead of revelling in the sorrow and self pity.  Keeping men in particular, in a perpetual state of powerlessness and confusion of their place in the world, is beneficial to corporations who profit from them being malleable and unfulfilled.  They can then fill that hole with consumerism.  Gadgets and games to pull them deeper into the virtual vortex.  The tribal pack mentality and instinct inside most men has also been safely grounded and channelled into sports teams, to distract from the things which really matter.  Opportunities for their children in the future become exponentially reduced, their rights and freedoms under threat, but their primal needs are catered to and supplemented by bread and circuses.  All is right with the world if their team wins on Saturday.

We are all guilty at times of surrendering to seduction of the material world and the false satisfaction it brings but the soul also needs to be worked on.  That’s largely what’s missing from modern suburban life.  We have been conditioned to believe we must be happy all of the time, but there is learning in the darkness and true wisdom can be attained by looking the shadow in the eye and facing up to it to find solutions, rather than ignoring it and giving up.  Doing this doesn’t make it disappear, it still lingers unresolved to bubble back up to the surface later on.  Perhaps at a time when you are least equipped to handle it.  The collective unresolved trauma of the past few years is now largely being ignored and suppressed by a huge mass of people across the world, who must on some level know something is amiss.  Until that is faced and addressed, the shadow will only continue to grow.  Happiness without sadness is artificial, you can never appreciate true happiness if you haven’t experienced sadness to gauge it against.  Disappointment and failure are a part of life and making our own mistakes is how we grow as people, it is part of the natural cycle of life.  Learning how do your own inner work and not externalising your problems is the path to finding success and inner peace.  The encroaching nanny state gaslights and postures as a concerned parent and has convinced so many of its compassion and benevolence, but the love on offer often comes in the form of medication or a pill.  Soon that pill may even be a life ending one.

Remember back in 2018, how abortion was sold to us?  Now the Marxist and feminist extremists want them at full term.  Once the Pandora’s Box to Euthanasia is opened, there is no turning back and you can be guaranteed that it will follow a similar trajectory.  The insanity of the MAiDS law in Canada is working, real world proof of what will pan out in the future, as our ‘liberals’, state apparatchiks and medical professionals, here in Ireland, are by no means any less psychotic than those in Canada.  With the suggestion by people like Ruane, of the potential applications of a new euthanasia bill, it clearly shows the thought patterns of these types ahead of time before it is even voted on.  What will initially be pitched as ending granny’s suffering, could in no time at all expand out to other cohorts, should they wish to avail of the ‘service’.  How long before a depressed teenager is offered this ‘treatment’ as a solution to depression brought on by the woes foisted upon them due to their increasingly meaningless, mechanical suburban existence?  As they dive deeper into the virtual metaverse with VR goggles strapped to their heads, physical reality is in danger of becoming even less real and meaningful to them than it already is.  With suicide a very real epidemic among young people, would anyone be surprised if there was actually in fact a demand for this in the future?  Do you really believe that couldn’t happen here?  Pop on the headset and go to your happy place, then nod off while the pill takes effect.  It’s a truly terrifying thought.  A roadmap towards a completely dysfunctional dystopia, one we must try to ensure we avoid coming to pass at all costs.

Modern progressive Ireland seems to be actively cultivating an atmosphere that is anti-life and is devoid of any kind of spiritual sustenance.  Women are encouraged to pursue careers instead of experiencing the joy of having children.  This has been a constant theme for years now in the west as a whole and it has successfully taken hold in Ireland, perhaps due in no small part to how negatively women were treated not too long ago, particularly if they found themselves with child outside of wedlock.  A strong career acts like a form of liberation for independent women, removing the shackles imposed upon their predecessors, who were less fortunate than they to live in more strictly conservative times.  Some even doing a full 180, favouring a life of promiscuity over the wholesome family life.  Many I’m sure will say they are fulfilled and enjoy the independence and self esteem a successful career gives them, but the motherly instinct is so strong in women that a longing for children, certainly must factor in their thoughts and indeed emotions at some stage.  Some sadly find out what they want too late.  The window is painfully short for women and as we know the years have a tendency to fly by all too swiftly.  Even women with high powered careers who decide they do want children, often find they are faced with a choice due to the colossal cost of childcare.  If they do decide to have children, they are having less than the women of previous generations.

Then there’s the environmental propaganda encouraging people to have less children or to even abstain from procreation altogether.  The reduction of beautiful children into units of carbon is something that could only have been conjured up in the mind of a psychopath.  The fanatical, cult-like, eco-warrior types see children as a burden on the planet so are refraining from having any, which in their mind helps with overpopulation, a concept planted in their minds directly by every communications medium there is.  It’s mainly directed at westerners however, who seem to be the target demographic for all of this.  The whole transgender phenomenon which is being heavily pushed and promoted to children now also has the net result of sterilisation, a reproductive dead end, finishing bloodlines permanently as a result.  Not before the pharmaceutical industry makes millions of the people (including children sadly in increasing numbers) through puberty blockers and HRT.  The net result of all this is of course less people, which is remarkably and conveniently helpful to aid the wishes and aspirations of the globalists and their desire for a drastically reduced population.  One would almost think it was planned.

Another metric which is becoming deeply concerning is the average 20% rise in excess mortality, not just in Ireland but across the west as a whole.  The recent development itself is strange enough, but so too is its omission from any news reports.  There has been a complete media blackout regarding these extremely worrying trends and statistics.  Remember, these were broadcasters and publications who reported daily, sometimes hourly, on coronavirus cases as if they were going to trigger Armageddon.  They even skewed death figures to make it appear as though Covid was the main cause for the untimely demise of people who had multiple other co-morbidities, a fact even admitted by Varadkar in the Dáil.  You would think 20% more people dying than usual would be newsworthy, particularly since the entire world was locked down to protect people above the age of the average life expectancy.  Varadkar also addressed this when asked, he partially attributed the phenomenon to lockdowns, the government’s own policy!  If we had any sort of a media he would be grilled and destroyed for such a statement.  Here he is basically admitting that the government had a direct hand and are at least partly responsible for the deaths of 20% more people than the usual average.  Not a whisper, a predictable free pass.  The fact it comes hot on the heels of a disastrous vaccine campaign, that we know didn’t stop the spread or stop people getting it (as initially advertised) is all the more suspicious.  Even Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates - two of its champions - were forced to later admit, it was ineffective.  We already knew strokes, blood clots and myocarditis were all side effects, so could it be a case that these life threatening side effects are a contributing factor to the excess mortality.  On a balance of probability, I would suggest the chances are pretty high.

What was really bizarre, was how all this was immediately forgotten about as soon as the media switched narrative to focus entirely on the Ukraine war.  It was like Covid and all the horrors and loss of freedom it entailed, simply never even happened.  It went from us not being able to travel, to politicians paradoxically letting uncapped numbers of people into the country (many not from Ukraine).  Irish citizens needed vaccine passports a few months prior to people entering Dublin Airport without actual passports.  It went from you not being permitted to have family members in your home, to being asked to take in Ukrainian strangers to live in your home.  Completely bonkers stuff they managed to normalise and people followed once more.  Now the Ukrainian war and the fleeing women and children story, is no longer even used as a cover anymore.  Roderic O’Gorman felt confident enough to openly admit that the majority of international protection applicants, were young men, not from Ukraine.

This is not only happening here in Ireland, though it is quite pronounced and more noticeable here, perhaps because we are such a small island that has traditionally been quite insular and homogeneous.  It is happening all across Europe which suggests a globally driven directive.  The UN have their own white paper on the subject of replacement migration which EU governments - with the exception of Poland and Hungary - seem to be in lockstep with.  Why would governments want to dilute what makes their countries authentic and culturally unique?  Globalisation and a one world government (a goal they make no secret of pursuing) is far easier to achieve if all it’s new global citizens are from everywhere and from nowhere simultaneously.  If the Irish, the English, the French or anyone else become a minority in their own country, can it any longer be called theirs?  Can Ireland still be called Ireland without the Irish being a sovereign majority and in charge of our own affairs?  An Ireland ‘for all’, the communistic catch phrase of the left, really means an island for nobody, including the new migrants who are merely pawns in a geopolitical chess game, everyone who is not considered a ‘stakeholder’ will be disenfranchised and forced to fight for the scraps, allegedly of course.  Can a nation with no identity have any hope of standing against the new corporate hegemony, who placate its people in the short term with employment and trinkets while they march on mercilessly, insatiably devouring the true resources and wealth of nations?

There have been a number of powerful players (including the founding fathers of the EU), over the years have pushed for a European Federation, to create a massive geo-political/economic bloc as a buffer zone between the USA in the west and Russia and China in in the east.  The views and manoeuvres of these men lend weight to the theory at the heart of this essay.  Heavily indicating that there may be more than a pinch of veritas beneath the virtuous charitable veneer.  What started out as an economic Union was never meant to stay that way, that was only ever to be a stepping stone on the path to the formation of a European superstate.  Mass migration and multiculturalism is also one of the chief targets for those who have worked relentlessly throughout their careers to bring this into being.  The existence of powerful elected, but mostly unelected figures from both past and present - who’ve handed over the reins to the next generation of bureaucrats to advance their aims - suggests that there may very well be a coordinated strategy of joined up thinking going on behind the scenes.  Let’s take a closer look at some of these power brokers.

A quote from one of the European Union’s founding fathers, Jean Monnet, shows the intent that seems to have been there from the outset. “Europe’s nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.”  Another quote from Monnet highlights the desire to dissolve national sovereignty, with the continued mutual prosperity of all the nation states providing the excuse, “There will be no peace in Europe if the States rebuild themselves on the basis of national sovereignty, with its implications of prestige politics and economic protection... The countries of Europe are not strong enough individually to be able to guarantee prosperity and social development for their peoples. The States of Europe must therefore form a federation or a European entity that would make them into a common economic unit.”  It all sounds very utopian, not too dissimilar to the stated goals and visions, of the unelected puppet masters of today, Klaus Schwab and his plan for a ‘Great Reset’, being perhaps most prominent among them.  The erosion of national sovereignty could be hugely beneficial to would be tyrants who wish to impose their idealistic notions upon the world.  The centralisation and consolidation of power into fewer hands, would be a key mechanism towards achieving this.  The new technocratic elite class may even have the best of intentions in their own minds, but as we know all too well from history, those are the stone slabs that pave the road to hell.

Another of Europe’s founding fathers and a figure of much speculation among nationalist circles, is the Austro-Hungarian philosopher, politician and aristocrat Count Richard von Coudenhove Kalergi.  He was born in Tokyo in 1894 to a Japanese mother, where he spent the early part of his childhood.  The ‘Kalergi Plan’ is roundly dismissed on the likes of Wikipedia and other such mainstream search engines as a ‘far right conspiracy theory’.  But like many topics ridiculed as conspiracy theories, you will find they often contain little nuggets of truth.  Melissa Fleming, Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications at the United Nations, spoke last year at a World Economic Forum panel discussion regarding disinformation, where she admitted to working closely with tech giants like Google, to control the narrative around Covid.  “We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do”; this is a statement she is on video making.  A mindset responsible for censoring and silencing dissenting voices of experts who disagreed with the official ’science’, who in many cases later turned out to be correct.

Climate change is another ‘settled science’ they plan to suppress information deemed by them to be untrue.  Pushing it further down the feed, in favour of the unchallenged mainstream stance, by manipulating the search algorithm.  As a result of all this interference from vested interests and it must be said the existence of genuine disinformation and misinformation as a result of lazy and poorly researched material, it’s difficult to take anything at face value anymore.  With powerful global bodies and their agents actively and selectively cherry picking which information we get to see - which then in turn helps shape public opinion and also attacks and discounts what is considered disinformation and/or ‘harmful’ - how do we know what information is accurate.  What I’m getting at here is, can these tech companies really be trusted to present us with factual information, or are their search engines merely being used as a tool to steer narratives and protect the truly powerful puppeteers who rarely put themselves on public display?  We already know the corporate media can no longer be trusted so the answer here, one would imagine is quite similar.

Although there is no actual plan written down, Kalergi did write extensively on his Pan-European vision.  In his 1925 book, Practical Idealism he wrote; "The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals."  This is referred to as a prediction for the future rather than an actual plan, however looking at present day Europe, it looks as though Kalergi either had a crystal ball or else someone or a group of people with decision making power, may have - at the very least - been influenced and inspired by his ideas.  With his vision for a single currency and open borders now a reality, he also wanted a single passport, which may still yet one day be introduced.  Adolf Hitler referred to him as a ‘cosmopolitan bastard’ in Mein Kampf.  His views on multiculturalism, migration and above all the mixing of races, would of course have been completely at odds with the views of the  ‘Führer’ and his belief in an Aryan master race.  The very idea of the racial and ethnic purity of the blonde haired and blue eyed Germanic people being compromised must have infuriated Hitler, like a red rag to a bull.  The two men had diametrically opposing views regarding the future of Europe.

Moving forward a few decades and closer to home, little old Ireland is no stranger to leading global shapers.  The ‘old sod’ spawned a massive player on the global stage, though he would probably have been ashamed of that fact.  As are we.  Patriotism was the antithesis of everything this individual stood for.  A man with absolutely no love or attachment to his native land.  The now deceased, former Attorney General and Chairman of Goldman Sachs, Peter Sutherland.  He finished out his glittering career on the global stage, in 2017 as UN Special Representative for International Migration, before dying in 2018.  He was known as the ‘Father of Globalisation’ due to his founding of the World Trade Organisation, serving in the role of its first Director General.  Sutherland was a hugely influential figure in global affairs, with a career in geopolitics spanning three decades.  He was appointed Chair of the London School of Economics in 2006 and is described by them as being passionate about education.  Of course, the shaping and moulding of young minds is an absolutely essential ingredient for someone with such lofty and revolutionary ambitions for a new reimagined world.  Such radical planetary changes, of the type Sutherland envisioned, could only be achieved through indoctrination of young people, by getting them on board to buy into your ethos, eventually adopting as their own.

He was responsible for the launching of the Erasmus+ programme established in 1987, which offered university students a possibility of studying or doing an internship abroad in another country for a period of at least 2 months and maximum 12 months per cycle of studies.  A nice little perk for those who successfully applied for it.  This would of course play a part in encouraging multiculturalism by coaching young adults on new ways of thinking, nudging them towards globalism, as opposed to an outdated (in his mind) nationalistic world view.  Most of Sutherland’s roles however, were in the field of migration, an issue very close to his heart.  He was an unapologetic internationalist with no patriotic views towards Ireland whatsoever.  He viewed nationalism as a concept where “one group of people, believed themselves to be better than another group of people”, (I’m paraphrasing one of his quotes) at least that was how his public face presented it.  Many of his quotes leave us with no ambiguity regarding his views and leave us under absolutely no illusions as to where his loyalties lay.

“We still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others, and that's precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.”  It could be argued that this type of thinking, is of someone heavily influenced by his predecessors.  Men like Monnet and Kalergi, who envisioned a multicultural, multiracial and federalised Europe.  Is it mere coincidence that men with this mindset keep finding themselves in such prominent positions of global influence and power?  Sutherland also worked closely with the Vatican and was recruited by Pope Francis to oversee the Vatican finances following a series of financial scandals.  He was also elected president of the International Catholic Migration Commission.  The Europe we see today has largely been created by this globalist powerhouse, who seemed to occupy more key influential roles within the international community, than almost any other bureaucrat who came before him or since.

In an article he wrote with Cecilia Malmström (Swedish politician and former European Commissioner for Trade), for Project Syndicate he opened with the impassioned plea; “Europe faces an immigration predicament. Mainstream politicians, held hostage by xenophobic parties, adopt anti-immigrant rhetoric to win over fearful publics, while the foreign-born are increasingly marginalized in schools, cities, and at the workplace. Yet, despite high unemployment across much of the continent, too many employers lack the workers they need. Engineers, doctors, and nurses are in short supply; so, too, are farmhands and health aides. And Europe can never have enough entrepreneurs, whose ideas drive economies and create jobs”.  You would struggle to find many who would object to this statement were it genuine and were the nations of Europe actually receiving the type of people Sutherland promised with these words.  The reality on the ground paints a very different picture.  If you take Sweden as a benchmark, the country of his co-author’s origin, and analyse their rape and violent crime statistics since the ‘doctors, engineers and entrepreneurs’ started flooding in, they tell a less than wholesome story, to say the very least.  The Swedes didn’t just wake up one day and decide to do this to their own country.  It happened through forced migration, which was initially presented benignly, just as in Ireland now, before reality set in.  Now conservative parties have grown in popularity and the country is adopting a more hardline approach, but only after completely avoidable carnage had ensued.

Sutherland was also on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group and was memorably confronted by Luke Rudowski of We Are Change in Copenhagen, ahead of their conference in 2014.  He was accompanied at the time, by a budding young globalist.  Fine Gael politician, Simon Coveney.  It was like a passing of the baton over to the next generation of Fine Gael globalist insiders.  Sutherland showing his new young apprentice the ropes and what would be required of him in big boy politics.  The kind where votes and public opinion and even nation states themselves are irrelevant, way beyond the local parochial kind in the provincial backwater of the Irish Republic.  In 2017, Coveney narrowly missed out on party leadership to Leo Varadkar, but in many ways that allowed him to work away quietly in the shadows and under the radar.  His brother Rory was Director of Strategy for RTÉ until the recent scandal (no conflict of interest there).

He has held some very strategic ministerial positions himself at key times, such as Foreign Affairs and Defence, between 2020-2022.  Perfect timing to be on hand to comment and push for Ireland joining NATO by adding his tuppenceworth to the newly accepted conventional wisdom, Russia bad, Ukraine good.  He and others informed us that we were basically no longer neutral and it was a good idea to make a powerful enemy in the form of the Russian Federation.  He was also minister for foreign affairs when he allowed his buddy Joe Keeling to fly in cheap fruit-picking labour from Bulgaria, while the rest of us were told we had to be locked down, for our own safety while the greatest plague in history ravaged the country and the world.  These workers were deemed essential however, because a favour for a friend, who attended his wedding and who he also appointed Chair of Horse Racing Ireland, of course took precedent over ‘public safety’.  What a multimillionaire businessman friend could offer a senior politician such as Coveney in return for favours such as these, is anyone’s guess.  We can only speculate.  I’m sure it’s mere coincidence that he now holds the position of Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment, at a time when thousands of able bodied young men have arrived into the country (and continue to), who could potentially be used to make wages more competitive in the workforce across all sectors (diversity quotas are also starting to pave the way for the premature obsolescence of qualifications).  Big business and the likes of Joe Keeling would no doubt approve, but sure what are friends for.

Larry Goodman was also a beneficiary to Coveney’s kind nature when he was basically given full control of Irelands beef export market into the United States, in 2015.  A deal estimated at the time to be worth €15 million per annum.  Coveney was questioned on this matter in the Dáil and said; “ABP Food Group is the largest beef processor in Ireland and Britain and from my experience, it runs a pretty good show.”  This was a bit of a strange statement considering Goodman was at the heart of the horse meat scandal in 2013, when 29% horse meat was found in Tesco beef burgers wiping €300 million off the value of the  giant British supermarket chain.  Irish food group Greencore, were also embroiled in the scandal.  They saw their stock fall by 22 percent, when ASDA withdrew beef bolognaise sauce which was found to have traces of horse DNA.  Coveney’s brother Patrick, just so happened to be CEO of Greencore at the time, coincidentally enough.

The Coveney’s like their father before them, were educated in one of Ireland’s most prestigious Jesuit boarding schools, Clongowes Wood College in Clane, Co. Kildare.  An institution which can boast of famous past alumni such as James Joyce.  The previously mentioned Peter Sutherland, was also educated by the Jesuits, in Gonzaga, a separate institution in Ranelagh, no less prestigious to the one his protégé attended.  In fact many of Irelands prominent businessmen, judges and political figures were educated in private Jesuit schools.  Belvedere being another notable one.

Coveney’s father Hugh was a quantity surveyor and was a fellow at the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.  He was born into one of Cork City’s prosperous ‘merchant prince’ families in 1935.  He later became a TD himself and served as Minister for Defence and Minister for the Marine.  He was later demoted to a junior ministry position after allegations of improper contact with businessmen.  He was no stranger to controversy himself, changing his will on the eve of his death, leaving everything to his wife.  This was ten days after he was questioned by the Moriarty Tribunal regarding the existence of an Ansbacher offshore account.  He died in mysterious circumstances, falling off a cliff while out walking alone.  Simon Coveney put the whole affair down to ‘coincidence’.

Coveney has worked closely on Project Ireland 2040.  It is a radical (undemocratic) plan to create a new vision for Ireland.  This plan has been pitched to ‘stakeholders’ (there’s that word again) within universities and elsewhere but has gone largely unnoticed by the public at large.  The text below is directly from Coveney’s own website.

‘While we face many challenges presently, we know we need to think ahead for a radically different Ireland of 2040 including;

• A national population increase of around 1 million people;

• More than one-fifth of Ireland’s total population being over 65;

• More than 500,000 additional people at work;

• 500,000 homes needing locations much closer to services and amenities; and

• rebuilding community and commercial life in the hearts of our cities and towns and protecting the many qualities of our rural communities.’

How is this magical figure of one million  people going to be achieved if not through immigration?  This ambitious target for Ireland was never brought to the people for consultation, only the usual handpicked stakeholders in the universities and NGO’s who they are certain will give support.  This gives the illusion of a mandate where none exists.  The last 2 points in particular sound very similar to the 15 minute city concept, the ruling class have planned so we can effectively fight ‘global warming’ or ‘Climate Change’ depending on this weeks weather.  This plan is something that will demographically change the Irish people irreversibly, so surely if we are the democratic republic we are supposed to be we should have at least been asked to vote on it.  Is the current government policy of indiscriminately trafficking illegal migrants into the country in a reckless, uncontrolled way a means of facilitating this plan?

The underhanded nature of it suggests it’s part of an already decided upon agenda, with someone like Sutherlands paw prints all over it.  It appears he is still tormenting us from beyond the grave, posthumously pulling the strings of Coveney and possibly other lesser lights he may have influenced and moulded to adopt his mindset as their own, to carry on his work.  That work, which he never once hid, is the unabashed undermining of national sovereignty, (not just in Ireland) in favour of a soulless totalitarian global model, with no identity and centralised control. It’s quite fortuitous for Coveney and top civil servants to have the overtly insane Green Party on hand and specifically, the migration mudguard himself, Roderic O’Gorman, to be the public face to take whatever minor heat that comes as a result of attention being drawn to the subject, while the real plans are implemented in the background and trundle slowly along, largely unnoticed.

When Coveney was first elected a TD, the celebratory scenes stank of that whole Ivy League American dynastic vibe.  One of the ‘good ole boys’ sons finally coming of age and getting a slice of the cake.  Claiming a portion of what was rightfully his.  Winning his dead fathers seat in Cork South Central in 1998, something not too uncommon in Irish politics, as we’ve seen recently with McEntee.  The whole thing had more than an air of providence to it.  The class system is not only alive and well in the UK and US, but in Ireland too, it’s just a little less in your face here.  A lot of Ireland’s ‘Übermensch’ are Anglo-Irish types who have business and trade links and even family connections, harking back to the halcyon days of the British Empire.  The current ruling class in Ireland are not people who have any loyalty or love for this country.  Particularly the ‘West Brit’ party of Fine Gael who would perhaps have more in common with  wealthy Northern Unionists than working class Dubliners.  There is now growing consensus, due to mounting evidence, that the people in decision making positions of power in Ireland, are selected rather than elected.  Coincidentally enough they all seem to have identical views in all the key areas of interest.  Climate, Public Health advice, LGBTQ+ issues and the topic of this essay, migration are the levers being used to steer us towards global synthesis and harmonisation.  The death of culture and the end of the sovereign nation state.

Of the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals laid out for Agenda 2030, ten are concerning migration.  Why?  Would the development of the third world not be more beneficial to its people than making them mere welfare recipients in Europe?  Surely this would have less of an impact on so called ‘carbon footprints’ with less people moving about the place.  They would also be putting less pressure on eco-systems in their new, already densely populated homes.  They would also be putting far less strain on services, health and housing in western nations, with now crumbling infrastructure which is not being sufficiently maintained.  If the alleged ‘Climate Emergency’ is forcing the west to think differently and cut back, why are we being asked to give away a reduced portion of what we once had?  Surely all these extra people will put pressure on reduced food production and coming energy rationing, planned for in the near future?

It seems like the migration and climate agendas don’t work together at all, is that the point?  Nor does fusing the Islamic world with the Pride movement.  More contradictions to gaslight and confuse the masses?  The new line we are being fed (without evidence of course) is that these people are fleeing from climate change.  The natural resources and raw materials of the third world are obviously less important to the western oligarchy, than the welfare of its people.  Our kind hearted western executive types have been making sacrifices for decades now through the countless charity organisations in operation on the African continent and elsewhere, as proof of their humanity, compassion and dedication.  With only the meagre reimbursement of a six-figure annual salary to show for it.  Little did we know when we were putting coins in the Trocaire box as children that we were basically funding the creature comforts of fat cats, while the emaciated poster child on the front of the carton, in the vast majority of cases, suffered on.

The fact these organisations still exist at all is testament to their failure as charities but perhaps it also betrays their success as businesses.  One or two children who managed to survive into adulthood, often got paraded for photoshoots to boast of the success of these projects, or paraded on stage at some event organised by Bob Geldof, but in reality like so much else contrived in the west presented as helping Africa, these charity foundations are a racket.  Perhaps I’m wrong and all the money we donated as kids, went into a trust, saved up to pay for flights to transport African men into Europe and we are only now seeing the fruits of our donations become a reality.  Who knows?  The rulers of this world never let a good crisis go to waste, or in this case multiple crises which seamlessly dovetail with one another.  Isn’t it so lucky for them, that anomalies in the corporate and political sphere can almost always be easily explained and attributed to coincidence and furthermore be swallowed wholesale by the masses.

All of this of course, more than hints to the possibility of a deliberate hidden agenda to strategically move high volumes of people from the third world to plant them into all the nations of Europe.  Is the current situation we are witnessing merely the plans and wishes of powerful dead men, handed down to the next generation of like minded successors - or more aptly groomed lieutenants - playing out in real time.  It could be all remarkably coincidental but there is certainly plenty to ponder, especially when considering the uncanny uniformity of thought connecting all the major decision makers.  Sceptics and debunkers by default see coincidence everywhere, even when the greater evidence points to the existence of a conspiracy as the more logical conclusion.  Some conspiracy theorists have a similar absolutist mentality and approach, whereby they see conspiracy everywhere and often get swept up in a frenzy and pulled down rabbit holes by improperly connected dots and badly researched information.  The truth more often than not, is somewhere in between in the finer detail.  One thing is for sure, anyone who has ever looked deep enough with a critical eye, knows coincidences in geopolitics are as rare as hens teeth.

Let’s look again at the present situation.  The mass movement of young fighting aged men out of their own countries and cramming them into basically any unoccupied building in Europe, can serve a dual purpose to the social engineers who make up the likes of the WEF and other global bodies.  Firstly, the strong fit individuals who are capable of being difficult and a menace to these wealthy, modern day conquistadors from the new corporate oligarchy, won’t be present in their own countries, while their resource rich nations are being raped for their spoils and the children of those countries are exploited through child labour and put to work, to mine cobalt for the coming electric car revolution.  Secondly, they can serve a potentially sinister purpose in their new found home.  While defence forces and policing staff are seeing an all time high of people leaving their ranks and also a decline in recruiting numbers, is it possible these men could be used to not only make up the shortfall, but to in time actually take over and be employed in a new NATO or UN quasi-military police force, which will act as a mercenary security force for the new ‘stakeholder’ class of dominant, oppressive elites?

With Gardai more concerned with pronouns and the policing of speech than actual crime fighting of late, is it not conceivable that these formerly respected institutions are being deliberately undermined to engineer a collapse to make way for a new more robust and more inclusive model?  All hypothetical of course, but ask yourself is it possible?  Would you put it past them?  A new globalised security force could be used for a plethora of applications, not least the strict enforcement of quarantine restrictions in the event of the ratification of the WHO Pandemic Treaty and the inevitable global health emergency that will be sure to follow swiftly after, to justify both its creation and existence.  They may also become the new prison guards for the planned 15 minute cities, who knows, but one thing is becoming clearer, they don’t appear to be coming to the west for refuge or asylum.  Hopefully the last paragraph is nothing more than paranoia and they are in Europe solely for economic purposes, but these thoughts are niggling and persistent hence the need for them to be transferred into words and committed to paper, in the event of our worst fears becoming a reality.

I will ask you, the reader, one question.  Can the counter argument to all the information I have just presented you with, simply be disregarded in its entirety and defined by one word - racism?  Are the concerned people out on the streets of their towns and villages really ‘far right’ as they are being presented, or do their concerns have merit?  It’s becoming clearer to increasing numbers of people now, that all the name calling is just a juvenile tactic from those in power - who must have something to hide - to smear people who are armed with the knowledge that could expose the frailty of their position, which is propped up merely by lies and propaganda.  The issue is far more complex and nuanced than how it’s being presented and it’s high time we had a proper debate and a more sensible discussion on such matters.

I have not witnessed any genuine racism or hatred coming from the people of this country.  Words have lost their true meaning, mainly because of how they have been used incorrectly and have been contextually blown out of all proportion for so long, by people who believe someone like Donald Trump is “literally Hitler”.  It’s tiresome, childish and downright ridiculous at this stage.  It’s quite telling that many sensible minded black Americans were Trump supporters, because unlike the Democrats he treated them as equals, instead of a protected class.  The patronising ’liberal’ notion of having to protect and provide welfare and charity for someone because of their skin colour is a far more racist viewpoint, than the mindset of the bulk of those considered ’far right’, which is the proverbial, “…teach a man to fish”.

Even through all this the Irish people have been remarkably peaceful, respectful and restrained.  It is not racist to want to preserve your own tribe with it’s ancient traditions, customs and culture, or to compromise its future prosperity by prioritising the interests of others, with a seemingly limitless pathological compassion, charity and duty to the rest of the world many Irish have naively given away what is rightfully theirs, the land.  People think because they are making money and have somewhere to live they are prosperous, but all our supposed wealth is debt based.  People have short memories and we seen how quickly things can change in 2008, when that debt was called in and collected to bail out bond holders.  The austerity measures imposed by the European Commission, ECB and IMF, colloquially known as the Troika, are still being felt today, with measures like the Universal Social Charge (USC) still being collected at source from PAYE workers wages, when it was only ever meant to be temporary.

We Irish are not an insular people.  We have always reached out to the world and shared what we had, when we could.  But this good nature we possess is a finite resource that is approaching its limit.  It has been cynically exploited and abused and is now working at the expense of ourselves and our own wellbeing.  People are now starting to realise this kind trait has been turned upon us like a loaded revolver that is now pointing at our heads.  The anger is slowly starting to bubble to the surface, now that people are finally coming to the realisation, that they’ve been taken for mugs.

If a manufactured scarcity does end up occurring as a result of madcap global policies and law and order breaks down due to political policing instead of crime fighting, people would instantly band together with the ones who they most identify with for safety.  The tribal instinct in humans has not gone away and it will quickly click into gear once the reptilian brain feels threatened.  Many of us have serious fears and concerns, that the social engineers moving large volumes of ethnically diverse men around the place, are fully aware of this fact and it is precisely the game being played.  The old divide and conquer, which rarely changes.

To build a new system you must undermine and collapse the old.  Creating a new order from the chaos you created.  The cult of Woke and it’s pathological tolerance of everything except tradition, is the mechanism being used to achieve this.  Being shouted down on the streets by Antifa types, will not wash anymore.  The tired old tactics have been found out.  A more substantive, detailed argument is required from those making accusations of racism (and/or insert relevant/irrelevant label here), but have they the honour and intellectual honesty or even the cognitive capabilities to present one?  Based upon the evidence we have witnessed the answer has to be a resounding no.  The impotence of these once successful tactics, could be the driving factor possibly leading us into the next phase of this silent, psychological war.  Their ability to build and control narratives is collapsing now in real time, so we may be about to see this war become a hot kinetic one.

So in closing, I will make a plea to you good people of all colours and creeds, who have settled in our country over the past number of years, through the correct channels.  This also hurts you.  Surely you must see that.  We are all tied up in this game and are merely pawns within it.  We are not your enemy.  Our enemy is a common one, that has us both in its sights.  I am a proud nationalist and will never, ever apologise for that, but I have never been against people who respect our ways and country, from coming here to live.  I love my country and my culture and you should love yours too and embrace your own brand of nationalism and have every right to carry your country in your heart should you feel that way, but this is Ireland and you decided to move here, our culture will not be replaced and will remain the dominant one on this island.

If you have designs on changing that, you are not welcome here and I can assure you, you will be made to feel that way should that be a goal you wish to pursue.  There are many foreign nationals working for NGO’s who show absolutely no gratitude for the life and opportunity this country has given them.  They antagonise us by calling us racist.  If you have lived here long enough you will know that’s not true.  Our children play together, we work together and socialise together through our children’s activities, but our country is far too precious to us to just give it away and what is happening currently, puts this small nation in serious jeopardy.

Nationalism is falsely being associated with racism, both here and on the wider continent.  This shows that it is ultimately what the globalists fear the most.  A re-emergence of nationalism across the world terrifies them.  So  let’s be proud of our differences, but we mustn’t allow these psychopaths to forge them into a hammer to be used against us, like they always have.  They are deliberately accelerating the movement of people in order to do just this in my view.  The chaos created will cause people to become less trusting of each other.  It is a pressure cooker environment that we need your help to calm down, to prevent the pot from boiling over.  Tensions will only continue to rise.  This may be already at a point where we can no longer prevent this.  But we must try.

The same ones claiming to be protecting you now, are the same ones whose forefathers exploited and pillaged the African continent for material wealth and resources for centuries in the name of empire, placing chains upon its people.  They are the same ones who have brought war to the Islamic world, razing the Middle East and North Africa to the ground and killing millions in the name of democracy.  Now I believe they plan to point you and the thousands of men arriving here, at the ordinary people of Europe to exact your revenge, for the crimes they and their predecessors committed upon your people.

Again I want to stress, we are not your enemies.  They are.  They are not us and they despise us as much as they do you, although they are currently love-bombing you and pretending they don’t.  Will you take the bait?  Or will you stop to think and realise the blatant manipulation and hypocrisy at play.  The young men they are flooding into Europe, will turn this island and the mainland into something completely unrecognisable to the civilised, relatively safe place you decided to settle in.  They too are being used as tools, to merely forward an agenda they will not benefit from in the long run either.

The human race has always been divided by these parasites and our differences used to keep us at each other’s throats.  Let’s turn the tables on them and become streetwise and mature enough to realise it’s up to us to emancipate ourselves from these slave masters.  There will always be weak types who take the short term charity and welfare, because it’s the easy option, but it is a race to the bottom in the longer term.  You need to start using your voice to support us, the natives of your new adopted homeland, because the lawlessness we are already seeing these young men engage will only escalate the more that arrive to our shores, inevitably leading to resentment of all migrants and that brewing hatred, will then also be harnessed and weaponised by the social scientists to create further chaos and misery.

This is Ireland, our country, but you have always been made to feel welcome here and are also part of our future.  However, we have now reached a fork in the road and very soon it will be time to choose the type of future you want that to be.  If you do decide to help us in this struggle, you will see just how loving and welcoming a people the Irish can truly be.  We the people of Ireland now recognise we are once again in a fight for our nation.  We are not foolish enough to believe this is simply migration.  This is a plantation and invasion.  Only an imbecile would support this disastrous policy.  We are being deliberately pitted against each other and ultimately we will all lose.  We must raise awareness to this collectively, step into consciousness and realise that the future they have planned, is planned to be bad for us all.

It’s time to step off the chessboard.

!