The Michael O’Leary Question

Maverick or Insider?

Michael O’Leary, Ireland’s polarising aviation tycoon, whose net worth is just shy of a billion, made a recent appearance on Newstalk with Pat Kenny to discuss the ongoing migration chaos in Ireland.

The Marmite magnate divides opinion like few others, many love him, many loathe him, but one thing is absolutely certain - no one can ignore him. When he speaks, even those who dislike him tend to prick their ears up to have a little listen.

I myself listened intently as O’Leary rattled off all the talking points that I and others have been blue in the face talking about for the guts of two years. I will admit at the time of first hearing the exchange, it was music to my ears. He confirmed all the things we were called racist for saying for the last two years.

The ongoing scam of open borders, people skipping across multiple safe countries coming here from far flung lands that have no direct flights to Dublin, men getting on planes from the UK with passports and disembarking in Dublin with them strangely absent, was all mentioned. “Flushing them down the toilet” were O’Leary’s exact words, who was seemingly somewhat familiar with this tactic.

He basically confirmed for us, all of the things we wanted to hear. At last a voice of reason from within the system - albeit a perceived outlier within it - to speak up for those who were silenced and dismissed as racists by the apparatus.

Confirmation of the ongoing scam from the horses mouth, someone whose airline, most of these so called ‘refugees’ likely use to get here. A lot more difficult a man to dismiss and ridicule than your average ‘far right’, ‘extreme nationalist’ (or whatever the label is today).

At first I thought this an extremely welcoming and positive development, but then an age old adage chipped away at my subconscious, which gave me pause, forcing me to look closer and to re-examine my position.

We are often at our most pliable and vulnerable when we hear our own thoughts and opinions repeated back to us by someone we know will be listened to by others. They were the words we have been crying out to hear being delivered to a wider audience, in this case directly to the car radios of middle Ireland.

O’Leary momentarily bypassed my guard with his delivery and briefly had me convinced with his little performance, but I have since come to realise my initial reading of this could be slightly off the mark. Perhaps even way off the mark.

That’s why re-evaluating your own assumptions and entertaining the prospect you may well be wrong is an essential part of knowledge attainment. Timeō Danaōs et dōna ferentēs (I fear the Greeks even when bearing gifts) translated from Virgil’s Latin epic poem Aeneid, bears a certain relevance worth considering in this instance.

I’ve been racking my brain since trying to figure out why this most controversial of positions was permitted on Newstalk, one of the worst of all the mainstream platforms for peddling the party line. What’s more, from a leading voice at the coal face of the industry that is the vehicle being used to drive this ‘scam’ (to quote O’Leary himself).

The fact he was brought on to discuss this topic in this manner, on this bought and paid for propaganda outfit, is suspicious enough in and of itself. It gets more suspicious still if we look a little closer.

Why now? Why suddenly, after two years of protests and the wholesale demonisation of huge swathes of the general public, has O’Leary - who has facilitated this scam in silence until now - decided to break ranks and present the contrarian view?

Are we to believe he has suddenly developed a conscience or a sense of patriotism and unease at what is happening in his home country of Ireland, or are we merely now at the stage on the problem-reaction-solution spectrum where it’s acceptable to acknowledge that the problem exists?

Is O’Leary the personification of the ‘reaction’ phase of the cycle. The tough talking go-getter who brings the masses to Spain on their holidays and tries to make flights affordable for the average Joe. A man they will surely listen to, when he alludes to the fact the ‘far right’ may have had a point all along.

Can you think of anyone better to give them permission to speak and garner a reaction from them, because I can’t. This was a man many in middle Ireland touted to run the country. They admire him, some begrudgingly, but most importantly, they also trust him to a degree.

The inevitable solution to be suggested off the back of all this, will most likely be a paperless one, in the form of a Digital ID, which is the gateway to hell if accepted. Is it time to sell to the public the new model for travel, which will then open up the field for it to be expanded out into all areas of our lives. Internet access being the big one.

The airline industry is the perfect place to start for the introduction of Digital ID’s, due to the effectiveness of it’s use during the Covid era. It will then no doubt be adopted by corporations to be forced upon their employees.

We must resist this at all costs because once this happens the next natural step is chip implants, because your phone is too cumbersome to carry around and of course it may get lost or lose power. What then? You can see the trajectory clearly.

The development of this technology to penetrate the human body is running in tandem with the geopolitical noise. It is not accidental and Digital ID’s are not the destination, they are merely the stepping stone towards the merging of man and machine. Transhumanism.

O’Leary must be watched like a hawk from here on in to see what ‘suggestions’ he might make or might be eager to facilitate, to solve the problem he suddenly became so animated about.

Is it mere coincidence that we now have an EU wide regulatory framework to attempt to regulate control the reality bending potential of AI. Of it’s myriad applications, the one in the image above seems rather paradoxical when you consider that we live in a continent with the free movement of people between the nation states, nearly all of which (for now) espouse an ideological commitment to open borders.

One would almost think they are engineering the problem with the solution already in mind - and already developed. But of course I could be mistaken and their motives are purely driven and are of an entirely humanitarian nature.

Political leaders - almost to a man - appear insistent and determined to allow endless amounts of potential criminals and terrorists across our borders, due to the loose controls in place, with of course the NGO industry aiding, abetting and deepening the crisis. If and when they get these controls in place we will all then be suspected terrorists until our biometric data is meticulously checked and verified.

It’s so fortuitous that such a versatile instrument of control, in the form of a digital ID can be utilised to cover multiple, freedom ending applications. The demon made flesh, Tony Blair, is practically aroused at the prospect of the unlimited totalitarian potential of such a tool.

It encroaches nicely into the areas of health (vaccine status in reality), migration, climate change of course and it will most likely in no time go from optional to mandatory, with incentives provided initially and punishments and perhaps fines later.

A clear uninterrupted pathway to a social credit system. But carrot comes before stick remember. If the people can be first cajoled, coerced and convinced into believing this is a great idea, than that makes the task a lot simpler to complete. This could be O’Leary’s role.

O’Leary, for his part, has already displayed a willingness to implement the discriminatory policies brought in by governments. Segregation and exclusion of customers, based upon what have later been proven and confirmed to be no more than the whims of Anthony Fauci, are proof this man would adopt the same stance again. The vaccine pass was literally the trial run and compliance test for the planned Digital ID.

It is entirely conceivable that O’Leary - who has been at the table of the inner sanctum for at least a decade - is aware of the fine detail of all the incremental steps leading us down the path towards digital slavery and he is just playing his role in this and going through the motions.

He often portrays himself as a rebel of sorts within the system, but as we have already seen, when it comes to aiding and abetting bureaucratic tyranny he was only too happy to oblige. When it mattered he was no rebel of any sort. Would he do it again, only this time bigger and bolder? I think we take an educated guess at that answer.

We must take into account O’Leary’s history of being a consistent guest at the Bilderberg meeting, his earliest invitation and subsequent appearance stretching as far back as 2015. This is something that cannot be overlooked.

I will admit he caught me off guard initially with his comments, but on closer inspection these are the classic Hegelian tactics used by those who really pull the strings. O’Leary, it must be acknowledged, is an excellent communicator who can be utilised to great effect to sell and ultimately advance the next phase of the agenda.

O’Leary was also in attendance at this year’s Bilderberg meeting in Madrid, which ran from 30th May until 2nd June where he was joined by Paschal Donohoe, World Economic Forum Young Global Leader, Leo Varadkar and serial Bilderberg attendee, Simon Coveney - who was groomed by the ‘Father of Globalisation’ himself, Peter Sutherland.

O’Leary would be well aware of the range of topics discussed at these meetings, he is a shrewd businessman who I’m sure he is not there for the prestige alone. He is there to network and see what’s in it for him. His industry is of huge strategic importance to the ongoing migration agenda.

Is it mere coincidence that barely a fortnight after the convening of the meeting in Madrid, he is given an open platform on a highly controlled, biased Irish radio station to robustly discuss the taboo topic people were censored and called names for speaking of? Call me a cynic, but I think not.

I would be willing to wager, that the globalists see the CEO of Europe’s biggest and most popular low fares airline as a key player to achieve their current aims. The mass movement of people across the continent would be a lot tricker and far less effective without the availability of abundant, affordable and in many cases dirt cheap flights.

Airports are also some of the most tightly controlled places on the planet, with the strictest of security measures. They also present the opportunity for enormous data harvesting potential as people are not left with much choice other than to comply with any and all inconveniences, if they want to make their plane journey to go on the holiday they killed themselves all year to save for.

From a brass tacks, purely business perspective it would be relatively easy to get someone like O’Leary on board with the globalist agenda, if he wasn’t already. Climate change regulations for example, could be a deadly bureaucratic weapon to be wielded like a rapier against any dissenting voices within the business world.

Making little incisions into Ryanair’s profit margins over time. Death by a thousand cuts which over time could finish the business altogether by making it a non-profitable commercial enterprise. The EU is a regulatory and legislative behemoth, O’Leary would no doubt be acutely aware of the capability of the Brussels mafia to ruin him should he decide to go rogue.

The mainstream rhetoric over the past while too, has largely been shifting towards seeding the notion of less flying for the peasants (O’Leary’s target consumer base) with carbon emissions of course blamed. This would hurt Ryanair’s business model immensely leaving their CEO in a no win situation.

Which begs the question, was a deal cut? Was he brought into the fold and invited to these highly secretive meetings to simply be told how things were heading and he can either play his part by coming on board and get rewarded down the line for services rendered or alternatively should be refuse, fall victim to the scenario presented above.

With huge numbers of people across the continent of Europe now increasingly aware of the nefarious agenda to steer us towards global hegemony, you can be absolutely certain that someone who has consistently attended the very meetings where these plans are discussed would be fully aware of the fine details of this agenda. Particularly someone as savvy as O’Leary. Although in public he would no doubt call you a conspiracy theorist for even mentioning the Bilderberg committee.

All of these plans to introduce Digital ID’s and use AI to track people’s biometric data are all spoken of openly now. It is no longer a secret. They won’t however go any deeper than O’Leary was sanctioned to go on Newstalk. That part you will need to find out for yourself.

It is common knowledge at this stage for anyone who is really paying attention. Are we really to believe that a man so highly relevant in the overall picture, is completely oblivious to all of this? I highly doubt it.

Without access to the minutes of the Bilderberg meetings O’Leary has attended we may never know for sure the extent of his involvement. However, do I believe his little cameo on Newstalk was random or accidental? Absolutely not. I would suggest we watch Mr. O’Leary extremely closely over the next while. Very closely indeed.